The Living Soul of Indian Poetics

From Rasa to Dhvani: Mapping the Inner Cosmos of Aesthetic Experience

This blog is written as part of an academic engagement with Indian Poetics and Aesthetics.

Introduction: What is the Soul of Poetry?

In the vast intellectual heritage of India, literature was never treated as mere entertainment. It was a philosophical exploration of emotion, language, beauty, and consciousness. This discipline, known as Kavyashastra (Poetics), sought to answer a timeless question:

What is the “Atma” (Soul) of Poetry?

Different thinkers gave different answers:

• Some said Rasa (Emotion)

• Some argued for Dhvani (Suggestion)

• Others defended Vakrokti (Oblique Expression)

• And some insisted on Riti (Style)

Together, these theories form what we may call The Grand Architecture of Indian Aesthetics.

1. Rasa Theory – The Foundation of Aesthetic Bliss

The foundation of Indian aesthetics begins with Bharata Muni and his monumental work, Natyashastra.

He gave the famous Rasa Sutra:

विभावानुभावव्यभिचारिसंयोगाद्रसनिष्पत्तिः

Rasa is produced from the combination of Vibhava, Anubhava and Vyabhichari Bhava.

The Three Ingredients of Rasa

1. Vibhava – The cause (stimulus)

2. Anubhava – The physical expression

3. Vyabhichari Bhava – The fleeting emotions

When these combine with a Sthayi Bhava (permanent emotion), Rasa emerges.

Rasa	Emotion
Shringara	Love
Hasya	Laughter
Karuna	Sorrow
Raudra	Anger
Vira	Heroism
Bhayanaka	Fear
Bibhatsa	Disgust
Adbhuta	Wonder
Shanta	Peace

Later, Abhinavagupta added Shanta Rasa and deepened the psychological understanding of aesthetic experience.

Sadharanikarana (Universalization)

When we watch Rama suffer, we do not feel personal grief. We experience universalized sorrow. This aesthetic distance produces Ananda (bliss).

2. Dhvani Theory – The Power of Suggestion

In the 9th century, Anandavardhana revolutionized Indian poetics through his seminal work, Dhvanyaloka.

While earlier theorists debated whether Rasa, Alamkara, or Riti was the soul of poetry, Anandavardhana made a bold declaration:

काव्यस्यात्मा ध्वनिः

Kavyasyatma Dhvanih

“Dhvani (Suggestion) is the soul of poetry.”

This shifted literary criticism from ornament and structure to inner resonance.

What is Dhvani?

The word Dhvani literally means “sound,” “echo,” or “resonance.”

But in poetics, it refers to meaning that is suggested but not directly stated.

Just as a musical note continues to vibrate even after it is struck, poetic meaning continues to echo beyond literal words. Dhvani is the unsaid meaning that the sensitive reader intuits.

The Three Levels of Meaning

Anandavardhana explained that language operates at three levels:

1. Abhidha – Literal Meaning

This is the direct dictionary meaning.

Example:

“The sun has set.”

It simply means the sun has gone below the horizon.

2. Lakshana – Indirect / Indicative Meaning

When the literal meaning is unsuitable, we move to implied meaning.

Example:

“He is a lion.”

We do not mean he is an animal.

We mean he is brave.

Lakshana modifies meaning through association.

3. Vyanjana – Suggested Meaning

This is the highest and most poetic level.

Example:

“The lamp flickers in the lonely night.”

Literal meaning: A lamp is burning.

Suggested meaning: Loneliness, waiting, separation, emotional fragility.

The poem never states the emotion —

Yet we feel it.

This is Dhvani.

Types of Dhvani

Anandavardhana classified Dhvani into three major categories:

1. Vastu Dhvani (Suggestion of Idea)

When a hidden concept or fact is suggested.

Example:

“The king slept peacefully.”

This might suggest political stability.

2. Alamkara Dhvani (Suggestion of Figure)

When a poetic ornament is implied rather than stated.

Instead of directly saying “Her face is like the moon,”

The poet may describe moonlight fading in shame.

The metaphor is suggested, not declared.

3. Rasa Dhvani (Suggestion of Emotion) – The Highest Form

This is the supreme form of poetry.

Here, the poem does not describe emotion directly.

It creates conditions that allow emotion to arise naturally.

Instead of writing:

“She was deeply sad.”

The poet may write:

“Her bangles slipped from her wrist, and the courtyard remained silent.”

We feel sorrow without being told.

Anandavardhana considered Rasa Dhvani the highest because emotion cannot be forced. It must be evoked.

Why is Dhvani Superior?

According to Anandavardhana:

• Literal meaning is limited.

• Ornament is decorative.

• Style is structural.

But Dhvani creates depth.

It transforms poetry from communication into experience.

Later, Abhinavagupta expanded Dhvani theory and connected it deeply with Rasa. For him, Dhvani was the mechanism through which Rasa becomes possible.

Without suggestion, emotion cannot fully blossom.

Dhvani does not impose meaning.

It invites participation.

Thus poetry becomes a collaboration between:

• Poet

• Text

• Reader

Dhvani vs Direct Expression

Consider two sentences:

1. “I am heartbroken.”

2. “The letters remain unopened on the dusty table.”

The first tells.

The second suggests.

The first informs.

The second transforms.

Dhvani teaches us that:

Great poetry whispers — it never shouts.

3. Vakrokti – The Beauty of Deviation

Among the great theorists of Indian poetics, Kuntaka offered one of the most stylistically sophisticated views in his treatise Vakrokti-jivitam.

He boldly declared:

वक्रोक्तिः काव्यजीवितम्

Vakroktih Kavyajivitam

“Oblique expression is the very life of poetry.”

For Kuntaka, poetry is not defined by emotion alone (Rasa), nor by suggestion alone (Dhvani), nor by ornament alone (Alamkara).

It lives in Vakrokti  the artistic twist in expression.

What is Vakrokti?

The word Vakra means “crooked,” “indirect,” or “deviated.”

Ukti means “expression” or “utterance.”

Thus, Vakrokti literally means crooked expression — but not in a negative sense. It refers to language that deviates from ordinary speech in a creative, aesthetically pleasing way.

If ordinary speech says:

“She is beautiful.”

Vakrokti transforms it into:

“The moon seems to borrow light from her face.”

The meaning is similar —

But the expression is artistically elevated.

For Kuntaka, this deviation itself produces aesthetic delight.

Why Deviation Creates Beauty

Everyday language is direct and functional.

Poetic language is:

• Layered

• Suggestive

• Stylistically charged

When language moves away from the expected, it creates surprise and pleasure.

Vakrokti is therefore:

• The mark of poetic genius

• The sign of creative imagination

• The difference between prose and poetry

Poetry begins where ordinary language ends.

4. Alamkara – Ornamentation in Poetry

The Alamkara school of Indian poetics places strong emphasis on figures of speech as the source of poetic beauty. Its early and influential exponent was Bhamaha, whose seminal work Kavyalamkara systematized poetic ornamentation.

Bhamaha famously compared poetry to a bride:

न कान्तमपि निर्भूषं विभाति वनितामुखम्

“Even a beautiful woman’s face does not shine without ornaments.”

Just as jewelry enhances natural beauty, Alamkara enhances poetic expression.

However, ornaments do not create beauty — they intensify it.

What is Alamkara?

The word Alamkara literally means ornament or embellishment.

In poetry, Alamkara refers to:

• Figures of speech

• Rhetorical devices

• Stylistic embellishments

They beautify both:

• Shabda (Sound)

• Artha (Meaning)

Thus, Alamkaras are broadly classified into:

1. Shabdalamkara (Figures of sound)

2. Arthalamkara (Figures of meaning)

Major Alamkaras Explained in Detail

1. Upama (Simile)

A direct comparison using words like like or as.

Example:

“Her face is like the moon.”

Here:

• Face = Upameya (object compared)

• Moon = Upamana (object of comparison)

• “Like” = Upamavachaka

Upama creates clarity and visual beauty.

2. Rupaka (Metaphor)

An implied comparison without “like” or “as.”

Example:

“Her face is the moon.”

Here the identity is complete.

The metaphor intensifies poetic impact.

Rupaka is considered stronger than Upama because it merges two identities.

3. Anuprasa (Alliteration)

Repetition of similar sounds for musical beauty.

Example:

“Softly sings the silent stream.”

The repetition of the “s” sound creates rhythm.

Anuprasa belongs to Shabdalamkara because its beauty lies in sound.

4. Atishayokti (Hyperbole)

Deliberate exaggeration.

Example:

“I cried a river of tears.”

The exaggeration is not meant to be literal.

It heightens emotional intensity.

Additional Important Alamkaras

To deepen your blog, you can include more figures of speech:

5. Utpreksha (Poetic Fancy)

When imagination suggests a possibility.

Example:

“The moon seems to smile.”

The moon is imagined as capable of smiling.

Utpreksha adds imaginative liveliness.

6. Shlesha (Pun)

One word carrying multiple meanings simultaneously.

Example:

A word that means both “lotus” and “face,” creating layered interpretation.

Shlesha demonstrates intellectual brilliance.

7. Yamaka (Repetition with Different Meaning)

Repetition of the same word with different meanings.

It creates rhythmic and semantic beauty.

5. Riti – The Geometry of Style

Among the many schools of Indian poetics, the Riti School gives central importance to style. Its chief exponent was Vamana, who systematized this theory in his work Kavyalamkarsutra.

He boldly declared:

रीतिरात्मा काव्यस्य

Ritiratma Kavyasya

“Style is the soul of poetry.”

While earlier theorists emphasized emotion (Rasa) or ornament (Alamkara), Vamana focused on the arrangement and organization of words. For him, poetry is not merely about what is said, but how it is structured.

What is Riti?

The word Riti means:

• Path

• Mode

• Method

• Style

In poetics, it refers to the distinctive arrangement of words (Padarachana) that gives poetry its unique character.

If Alamkara is jewelry,

Riti is the body structure on which ornaments rest.

Without proper structure, ornament and emotion cannot function effectively.

Riti and Guna (Qualities)

Vamana did not treat style as superficial decoration. He connected it deeply with Guna (poetic qualities).

Important Gunas include:

• Madhurya (Sweetness) – Softness and grace

• Ojas (Energy) – Strength and vigor

• Prasada (Clarity) – Lucidity and smoothness

• Samata (Evenness) – Balance and proportion

• Saukumarya (Delicacy) – Subtle refinement

Riti emerges when these Gunas are harmoniously arranged.

Thus, style is not random.

It is the organized manifestation of poetic qualities.

6) Auchitya

Kshemendra and Auchitya-vichara-charcha – The Principle of Propriety

The concept of Auchitya (औचित्य) means appropriateness, fitness, or propriety. It is one of the most refined principles in Indian poetics because it governs the overall harmony of a literary work.

Kshemendra, an 11th-century Kashmiri critic, systematically discussed this theory in his treatise Auchitya-vichara-charcha. According to him:

Even if a poem has Rasa, Alamkara, and Dhvani —

Without propriety, it loses its aesthetic charm.

What is Auchitya?

Auchitya ensures that every element in poetry is suitable to its context:

• Character

• Situation

• Emotion

Anumiti Theory: The Logic of Art

The Anumiti Theory connects Indian poetics with Nyaya (Indian Logic). According to Shankuka, aesthetic experience arises through Anumana (inference) rather than illusion or blind emotional identification.

When we watch an actor perform the role of Rama:

• We do not mistake the actor for the real Rama.

• We do not believe the events are historically happening.

• Yet, we experience genuine emotion.

How?

Through inference.

We observe:

• Facial expressions

• Gestures

• Tone of voice

• Costume and stage setting

From these signs, we infer the inner emotional state of the dramatic character. This inferred understanding produces aesthetic delight.

The Logical Structure of Aesthetic Experience

Shankuka adapts the Nyaya model of inference:

Example in logic:

• Smoke → Fire (inferred)

Example in drama:

• Tears, trembling voice → Sorrow (inferred)

• Firm stance, powerful speech → Heroism (inferred)

Thus, Rasa is not a hallucination or confusion — it is an intellectually mediated emotional experience.

The Painting Analogy

Shankuka compares drama to a painting.

A painted elephant:

• Is not real.

• Yet we understand it as an elephant.

Similarly,

An actor is not Rama.

But through representation and inference, we understand him as Rama.

This awareness maintains aesthetic distance while still allowing emotional participation.

Distinction from Other Theories

• Bharata Muni explains Rasa through emotional combination (Vibhava–Anubhava–Vyabhichari Bhava).

• Abhinavagupta emphasizes universalization (Sadharanikarana).

• Shankuka highlights inference (Anumiti).

Shankuka’s approach is more rational and analytical, grounding aesthetics in epistemology.

Philosophical Importance

Anumiti theory demonstrates that:

• Art is not deception.

• Aesthetic pleasure is not ignorance.

• The spectator remains intellectually alert.

The audience consciously participates in a structured imaginative world.

This theory bridges:

• Poetics

• Performance theory

• Logic

• Psychology

• Language

• Setting

• Style

• Meter

It is the principle of internal coherence.

Types of Auchitya (Forms of Propriety)

Kshemendra explains that propriety operates at multiple levels:

1. Vastu-Auchitya (Propriety of Theme)

The subject matter must suit the genre.

A tragic theme cannot be treated in a comic tone.

2. Rasa-Auchitya (Emotional Propriety)

The dominant emotion must remain consistent.

For example:

• In Karuna Rasa, excessive joking would destroy the mood.

• In Vira Rasa, weak or timid language is inappropriate.

3. Patra-Auchitya (Character Propriety)

Characters must speak and behave according to their nature.

• A king should speak with dignity.

• A sage should not use vulgar language.

• A child should not speak like a philosopher.

If Ravana suddenly becomes humble and timid without reason, propriety collapses.

4. Desha-Kala-Auchitya (Propriety of Time and Place)

The setting must be culturally and historically accurate.

• Snow imagery in a tropical desert scene would violate Auchitya.

• Modern slang in an ancient epic would feel inappropriate.

5. Alamkara-Auchitya (Propriety of Figures of Speech)

Ornaments must suit the mood.

• Heavy hyperbole in a sorrowful scene may feel artificial.

• Too many metaphors may burden the poem.

Why is Auchitya Important?

Auchitya acts as a regulating principle in Indian aesthetics.

If Rasa is the soul of poetry,

and Alamkara its ornament,

then Auchitya is its discipline and harmony.

Without propriety:

• Rasa becomes weak

• Dhvani becomes confusing

• Alamkara becomes decorative excess

Example of Violation of Auchitya

Describing a battlefield like a romantic garden:

• Comparing swords to “lotus stems”

• Blood to “rose petals”

• Warriors to “dancing lovers”

Such imagery may be poetic, but it destroys Vira or Raudra Rasa and creates emotional confusion.

Auchitya and Modern Literary Theory

Auchitya resembles:

• Aristotle’s concept of decorum

• The classical Western idea of unity and consistency

• Modern ideas of organic form

It emphasizes that literature is not merely decorative language —

it is a structured aesthetic experience.

The Deeper Philosophy Behind Auchitya

Indian aesthetics views literature as a harmonious universe.

Just as in nature:

• Each season has its proper flowers,

• Each raga has its proper time,

• Each emotion has its proper expression,

Similarly in poetry:

Everything must fall into place.

God Is Power: Religion, Totalitarianism, and the Sacred Politics of Control in 1984

Submitted to Prof. Dilip Barad Sir Click Here

This blog is written as part of the academic assignment given by Prof. Dilip Barad Sir, exploring the thematic synthesis of religion and political power in Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell. While the novel is widely recognized as a critique of totalitarian regimes, this analysis moves a step further by examining how Orwell constructs the Party as a secular religious order. In Oceania, theology is not abolished—it is replaced. Big Brother assumes the role of a divine figure, the Inner Party becomes the priesthood, and political loyalty transforms into sacred devotion. By equating “God” with “Power,” Orwell reveals the psychological mechanisms through which authority demands not only obedience but worship. This blog investigates how 1984 functions as both a political warning and a profound critique of organized systems that seek absolute control over truth, memory, and the human spirit. 

Briefing Document: The Synthesis of Power and Divinity in George Orwell’s 1984

The following document provides a detailed analysis of the thematic intersection between religious divinity and political totalitarianism as presented in George Orwell’s  1984 . The central thesis, encapsulated in the phrase "God is Power," represents the Party’s successful effort to replace traditional theological devotion with an absolute, collective political authority.Key takeaways include:

• The Replacement of Theology:  The Party functions as a secular religion, with its members acting as "priests of power" and Big Brother serving as a replacement for the divine.

• The Mechanics of Control:  Power in Oceania is maintained through the systematic erasure of the individual, the manipulation of reality (e.g., "2+2=5"), and the use of perpetual war as a tool for psychological conditioning.

• The Erosion of the Human Spirit:  The narrative tracks the transition of the protagonist, Winston Smith, from a believer in the "Spirit of Man" to a broken subject who voluntarily accepts the Party’s version of truth.

• Totalitarianism as Faith:  The source suggests that absolute power requires not just obedience, but a deep-seated, irrational love and devotion akin to religious worship.

The Occurrences and Significance of "God"

In the ostensibly atheistic and dystopic society of Oceania, the word "God" appears approximately eight times. These references are strategically placed, primarily in Part 3 of the novel, to illustrate the final stages of psychological conquest.

Key References to the Divine

Context,Significance

Ampleforth the Poet,"Ampleforth is sent to Room 101 for a ""thought crime"": using the word ""God"" to rhyme with ""rod"" while rewriting a poem by Kipling. He claimed he could find no other suitable rhyme, highlighting the Party's intolerance for any linguistic reference to the divine."

O’Brien’s Declaration,"O'Brien explicitly states, ""God is Power,"" framing the Party’s authority in theological terms."

Winston’s Interrogation,"When asked if he believes in God, Winston replies in the negative, asserting instead his belief in the ""Spirit of Man."""

The Final Submission,"After being broken by torture and conditioning, Winston writes ""God is Power"" on a table, signaling his total acceptance of the Party’s reality."

The Philosophy of the Inner Party

The source context explores the Inner Party's ideological framework through the character of O’Brien. This philosophy centers on the idea that power is the ultimate reality and the only true source of authority.

Power as a Collective Force

O’Brien explains that power is not held by individuals but is a collective entity. The individual only possesses power by ceasing to be an individual.

• Slavery is Freedom:  This slogan is presented as reversible. By submitting entirely to the Party and escaping one’s identity, a person becomes part of the Party’s immortality.

• Immortality through Submission:  Since every individual is doomed to die—the ultimate failure merging with the Party allows the individual to become all-powerful and immortal, as the Party itself never dies.

Power Over the Mind

The Party seeks absolute control over both the external world and the internal mind.

• Matter vs. Mind:  Control over matter is considered absolute; however, the Party’s true goal is the control of the human mind and memory.

• The Goal of Disempowerment:  The system aims to diminish the human being into a "mechanical puppet" or "robot" that thinks, feels, and forgets exactly as the Party dictates.

Mechanics of Totalitarian Domination

The Party utilizes several tools to maintain its grip on the citizens of Oceania, ensuring that no alternative reality can exist.

Surveillance and the Thought Police

• Constant Spying:  The source notes that Winston was under surveillance for seven years without his knowledge. Every action and word was monitored, illustrating the pervasive nature of the "spy eyes" of the Party.

• Thought Crime:  Any deviation from Party orthodoxy, even in thought, is treated as a terminal offense.

Propaganda and Perpetual War

• The Utility of Conflict:  War in Oceania is not intended to be won; it is intended to be continuous.

• Psychological Sacrifice:  Constant war justifies the scarcity of basic necessities (like razor blades) and encourages citizens to sacrifice their personal wellbeing for the state.

• Media Control:  Information is funneled through telescreens and radio, which are entirely controlled by the Party, making it impossible for citizens to verify the truth of the war or the state of the world.

Social Conditioning and "Doublethink"

The source discusses how conditioning is used to shift public sentiment rapidly.

• Mandatory Emotion:  The Party dictates when to love and when to hate.

• The Success of Mass Influence:  The source draws a parallel to modern media and film (specifically the success of the film  Pathan ), illustrating how societies can be directed to support or object to cultural entities based on prevailing signals from authority.

The Internalization of the Party’s Truth

The most profound victory for the Party is not the physical submission of its subjects, but their mental and emotional conversion.

The Conversion of Winston Smith

Initially, Winston believes in the "Spirit of Man" the rebellious, revolutionary nature of human beings that has historically overturned despots. However, the Party’s methods prove that the spirit can be crushed.

• The Final Acceptance:  By the novel's end, Winston accepts that 2+2=5 and that the past is alterable. He chooses to erase his own memories of the truth (such as the innocence of Jones, Aaronson, and Rutherford) in favor of the Party's lies.

• Becoming a "Good Human":  From the Party's perspective, Winston becomes a "good human" only when he has been entirely hollowed out and filled with the Party’s ideology.

Totalitarianism as a Religious Surrogate

The Party mimics the psychological structures of religion to ensure loyalty:

1. Devotion over Obedience:  It is not enough to obey Big Brother; one must love him.

2. Replacement of Deities:  The Party seeks to redirect the human tendency toward worship away from traditional gods (Jehovah, Baal, Isis) and toward the political leader.

3. Conditioning Future Generations:  The Party focuses on children so that they grow up without the capacity to question Big Brother, making their devotion "natural" and unforced.

Conclusion: The Warning of George Orwell

The source identifies George Orwell as a "bitter critic" of organized religion, particularly Catholicism. Through  1984 , Orwell suggests that the pursuit of absolute power leads inevitably to the exploitation of individuals and the destruction of society. By equating God with Power, the Party removes the moral and spiritual checks that might otherwise limit a government's authority. The novel serves as a reminder that when a political leader or party replaces the role of the divine in the minds of the masses, the result is a total loss of human freedom and the erasure of objective truth.

Infographics and Slidedeck from the video:

George Orwell's 1984: A Critique of Organized Religion

While George Orwell’s  1984  is traditionally analyzed as a political satire of totalitarianism, it serves as a deliberate and incisive critique of organized religion, specifically the Catholic Church. The novel constructs a world where the Party functions as a religious order, Big Brother serves as a primordial deity, and the machinery of the state mirrors ecclesiastical structures. Orwell’s personal history—ranging from his childhood resentment of religious education to his observations of the Church's collaboration with fascist regimes during the Spanish Civil War—informed his view of organized Christianity as an authoritarian system. By equating power with divinity and political loyalty with religious devotion, Orwell warns against the "habit of worshiping," suggesting that once an individual is conditioned to bow to an idol, they are easily manipulated by any power that assumes the mantle of the divine.

Structural Parallels: The State as a Religious Order

The world of  1984  is built upon foundations that mirror historical and theological religious frameworks. These parallels suggest that the superstates are not merely political entities but secularized versions of ancient religious divides.

Geopolitical and Theological Triads

The division of the world into three warring superstates reflects the three dominant Abrahamic religions.Superstate,Religious Parallel,Oceania,Judaism,Eurasia Christianity,East Asia,Islam.

Furthermore, the internal structure of the Party follows a pyramidal hierarchy that evokes the concept of the  Holy Trinity  (the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost). This is physically manifested in the pyramidal architecture of the Ministries, which are designed with three-sided angles to reinforce this religious geometry.

The Divine Status of Big Brother

Big Brother is framed as a primordial image of God. The ubiquitous slogan "Big Brother is Watching You" functions as a theological paradox:

• As Spying:  A tool of state surveillance and terror.

• As Providence:  A religious assurance that God is always watchful and caring. In this interpretation, "watching" implies that the deity will catch the follower if they stumble, providing a sense of safety that justifies the loss of privacy.

The Sacramental Process of the State

The Party does not merely demand obedience; it demands a "sacramental experience" of confession and redemption, mirroring the Catholic tradition of Penance.

The Cycle of Confession and Purification

The process Winston Smith undergoes is less a legal interrogation and more a ritualized purging of the soul. The transcript identifies a specific four-stage religious progression:

1. Penance:  The acknowledgement of "crimes" or sins.

2. Penitence:  The internal state of regret.

3. Mortification:  The application of physical pain (torture) to subdue the body.

4. Restoration:  The final "purification" where the sinner is "saved" and restored to the grace of the Party.

Room 101 and Dante’s Inferno

The Ministry of Love (Miniluv) serves as a physical representation of  Dante’s Purgatorio and Inferno .

• The Structure of Hell:  Much like Dante’s multi-storied depiction of hell, prisoners in the Ministry of Love move through different levels based on the severity of their "sins."

• Luciferian Figures:  Room 101 represents the bottom of the Inferno, where the most damned souls are held in fire. O’Brien acts as a "Priest of Power," a Luciferian or Mephistophelean figure who serves as the "right hand of Satan" (Big Brother) to purge the mind and memory of the protagonist.

Behavioral Control and Asceticism

The Party enforces social codes that are directly derived from religious ideologies regarding sexuality and devotion.

• Celibacy and Marriage:  The Party values celibacy and the disowning of family bonds, similar to religious orders. Organizations like the Junior Anti-Sex League promote "brahmacharya" (celibacy) so that every moment of an individual's life is dedicated solely to the "Organization" (the Party/Religion).

• Procreation as Duty:  Marriage and sex are tolerated only for the production of children—referred to as "bhaktas" (devotees). Without a continuous stream of followers, the "god" (Big Brother) ceases to have power.

• The Priests of Power:  O’Brien explicitly identifies the Inner Party as "Priests of Power." In this framework, God is defined as Power itself, and the Inner Party members are the clergy who manage its divinity.

Biographical and Ideological Context

Orwell’s critique of religion was not accidental; it was rooted in his personal evolution toward atheism and his political observations.

Personal Resentment and Atheism

In his essay  "Such, Such Were the Joys,"  Orwell reflects on his primary school years, noting that by age 14, he believed the accounts of God were true but realized he "hated Him" and "hated Jesus." This early exposure to religion as a mandatory part of a syllabus led to a lifelong distrust of organized faith, as he associated failure in religious study with a failure before God.

The Spanish Civil War and Fascism

Orwell’s transition from a critic of the Church to a staunch opponent was solidified during the Spanish Civil War. He observed the Catholic Church collaborating with fascist governments in Italy and Spain due to the Church's opposition to socialism and democracy. This led Orwell to view the Church as an  authoritarian regime  in its own right.

The Danger of "Power Worship"

Orwell’s primary concern was the human "habit" of bowing down. He argued that:

• Those who worship in a church are easily conditioned to succumb to "power worshiping."

• If the "spine" is trained to bow to an idol, it will eventually bow to any human or political figure that replaces that idol.

• Idolizing an institution leads to the abandonment of the morals and ethics that the institution was supposedly built to uphold.

Intertextual Links: Animal Farm

The critique of religion as a tool of control is also present in Orwell's  Animal Farm  through the character of  Moses the Raven . Moses speaks of "Sugar Candy Mountain" (a celestial city or heaven), which Orwell characterizes as a "dangling carrot" or a "lollipop" a false promise used to pacify the oppressed and prevent them from seeking democratic change in the present world.

Conclusion

The analysis posits that  1984  is a profound warning against the anti-democratic nature of religious practice. By adopting the language and structures of the Catholic Church, the Party in  1984  demonstrates how easily religious devotion can be pivoted toward totalitarian control. Orwell suggests that any system whether religious or political that demands absolute worship and controls sexuality, memory, and the "purification" of the soul is an enemy to human freedom.

Infographics and Slidedeck from the video:

/