A Critical Analysis of W. B. Yeats’s The Second Coming
W. B. Yeats’s “The Second Coming” (1920) is one of the most powerful poems of modern literature. Written in the aftermath of the First World War, the poem reflects the poet’s fear that the world has entered a phase of moral, political, and spiritual collapse. Instead of celebrating renewal or salvation, Yeats presents a terrifying vision of chaos and destruction. The poem is deeply symbolic and draws upon Yeats’s personal philosophy of history, religion, and civilization.
Historical and Intellectual Background:
Yeats wrote this poem during a time of immense turmoil. Europe was devastated by World War I, traditional values were breaking down, and violence was spreading across nations. Yeats believed that history moves in cycles, which he explained through his concept of “gyres.” According to this idea, every civilization rises, reaches its peak, and then collapses to make way for a new one. “The Second Coming” reflects Yeats’s belief that the Christian era was ending and a new, darker age was about to begin.
The poem opens with the famous image:
“Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;”
Here, Yeats uses the symbol of the gyre, which represents his belief that history moves in cycles. The widening gyre suggests that the world is spinning out of control. The falcon’s inability to hear the falconer symbolizes humanity’s loss of guidance, discipline, and moral authority. Traditional structures—religion, politics, and culture can no longer control human behaviour.
This loss of order leads to complete chaos, as Yeats declares:
“Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.”
These lines express the poet’s belief that the foundations of society have collapsed. The “centre” stands for moral values and shared beliefs, which once held society together. Their breakdown results in violence, confusion, and destruction. Yeats also criticizes the modern world by stating that “the best lack all conviction, while the worst / Are full of passionate intensity.” This suggests that thoughtful and ethical people remain silent, while violent and extreme forces dominate.
In the second stanza, Yeats introduces the idea of a “Second Coming.” However, instead of Christ, the poet imagines a horrifying creature:
“A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun.”
This creature, often called the “rough beast,” represents a new age born out of violence and cruelty. It moves toward Bethlehem, the birthplace of Christ, symbolizing the end of Christian values and the arrival of a brutal new era. The creature’s slow and deliberate movement suggests that this change is inevitable.
The poem ends with a disturbing question:
“And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?”
This unanswered question leaves the reader uneasy. Yeats does not offer solutions or hope; instead, he forces us to confront the frightening future shaped by humanity’s own actions.
In conclusion, “The Second Coming” is a powerful poem that captures the fear, uncertainty, and moral collapse of the modern age. Through vivid imagery, symbolism, and apocalyptic tone, Yeats presents a world where old values have failed and a dark new force is ready to take their place. The poem remains relevant today, as it continues to reflect moments of global crisis, violence, and instability.
Central Themes of the Poem:
1. Breakdown of Order and Civilization:
One of the most important themes of the poem is the collapse of social and moral order. This is clearly expressed in the famous lines:
“Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.”
The “centre” represents the moral and spiritual values that once held society together. With their breakdown, chaos and violence dominate. Yeats suggests that modern society has lost control and direction.
2. Loss of Moral Authority:
The image of the falcon and the falconer symbolizes the loss of guidance:
“The falcon cannot hear the falconer;”
Here, the falcon represents humanity, while the falconer stands for authority, tradition, or divine control. The growing distance between them suggests that humans no longer follow moral or spiritual guidance.
3. Violence and Chaos:
The poem is filled with violent imagery, such as blood-dimmed tides and drowned innocence. These images reflect the brutality of war and the destructive nature of modern civilization. Yeats presents violence as an uncontrollable force spreading across the world.
4. False Hope of the Second Coming:
Traditionally, the “Second Coming” refers to the return of Christ and the establishment of peace and justice. However, Yeats subverts this idea. Instead of Christ, a terrifying beast is born. This suggests that modern humanity does not deserve redemption, and what comes next will be cruel and merciless.
5. Birth of a New, Dark Age:
The “rough beast” represents the beginning of a new historical cycle. Its movement toward Bethlehem symbolizes the end of Christian values and the birth of a brutal new era. Yeats implies that each new age is born out of violence and destruction.
Symbolism in the Poem:
The Gyre:
The gyre is a spiral that represents Yeats’s theory of history. A widening gyre suggests instability and loss of control. The poem begins with this image to show that the world is moving toward collapse.
The Falcon and the Falconer:
This symbol shows the separation between humanity and moral authority. As the falcon flies farther away, control is lost, leading to chaos.
Blood-Dimmed Tide:
This image symbolizes widespread violence, war, and the destruction of innocence. It reflects the horrors of the modern world.
The Rough Beast:
The rough beast is the most powerful symbol in the poem. It represents evil, brutality, and the rise of a new civilization that is devoid of compassion and spirituality.
Bethlehem:
Bethlehem, the birthplace of Christ, symbolizes purity and hope. The beast moving toward Bethlehem suggests the replacement of sacred values with violence.
Use of Literary Devices:
Imagery:
Yeats uses dark and violent imagery to create a sense of fear and destruction. Images like “blood-dimmed tide” and “darkness drops again” make the poem apocalyptic in tone.
Symbolism:
Almost every image in the poem carries symbolic meaning. Yeats does not describe events directly but conveys his ideas through symbols that invite interpretation.
Allusion:
The poem contains biblical allusions, especially to the Book of Revelation and the Second Coming of Christ. Yeats reshapes these religious ideas to express modern anxiety.
Metaphor:
The falcon, gyre, and beast function as extended metaphors for historical change and moral decay.
Repetition:
The repetition of words like “turning” emphasizes confusion, instability, and the endless movement of history.
Tone and Mood:
The tone of the poem is dark, prophetic, and ominous. Yeats writes like a prophet foreseeing doom rather than hope. The mood created is one of fear, uncertainty, and dread, leaving the reader disturbed and uneasy.
Structure and Style:
The poem is divided into two stanzas.
The first stanza focuses on chaos, disorder, and the collapse of values.
The second stanza introduces the vision of the rough beast and the arrival of a new age.
The loose structure and lack of regular rhyme reflect the instability of the world Yeats describes.
Relevance of the Poem Today
Despite being written over a century ago, “The Second Coming” remains highly relevant. In times of political unrest, violence, and moral confusion, the poem continues to resonate. Its famous lines are often quoted to describe moments of global crisis, proving the timeless nature of Yeats’s vision.
How Yeats Uses Imagery to Convey a Sense of Disintegration in The Second Coming
W. B. Yeats powerfully uses imagery in “The Second Coming” to express the gradual breakdown of moral, social, and spiritual order in the modern world. Rather than describing chaos directly, Yeats creates a series of vivid and disturbing images that together convey a sense of complete disintegration.
The Widening Gyre: Image of Loss of Control
The poem opens with the image:
“Turning and turning in the widening gyre”
This image immediately suggests instability and disorder. The widening gyre symbolizes a world spinning outward, away from its centre. As the gyre widens, control is lost, indicating the breakdown of order in history and civilization. The circular movement also suggests confusion and the absence of direction, reinforcing the sense of disintegration.
The Falcon and the Falconer: Image of Broken Authority
Yeats continues this idea with the powerful image:
“The falcon cannot hear the falconer;”
Here, imagery is used to show the collapse of authority and discipline. The falcon represents humanity, while the falconer symbolizes moral, religious, or political authority. The increasing distance between them reflects a world where guidance has lost its power. This breakdown of communication contributes directly to social and moral disintegration.
The Blood-Dimmed Tide: Image of Violent Chaos
One of the most striking images in the poem is:
“The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;”
This violent imagery represents widespread bloodshed and destruction. The image of a “tide” suggests that violence is overwhelming and unstoppable. The drowning of innocence implies the loss of purity, values, and moral clarity. Through this image, Yeats presents disintegration not as isolated violence but as a global condition.
Darkness and Desert Imagery: Spiritual Emptiness
In the second stanza, Yeats introduces images of darkness and the desert:
“A waste of desert sand”
The desert symbolizes spiritual barrenness and emptiness. Unlike fertile land, it suggests a world incapable of growth or renewal. The darkness that “drops again” further emphasizes confusion and moral blindness. These images convey a civilization that has lost its spiritual foundation.
The Rough Beast: Image of a Dehumanized Future
The most disturbing image of disintegration appears in the vision of the rough beast:
“A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun.”
This hybrid creature represents the collapse of human values. Its animal body and emotionless gaze symbolize the loss of compassion, reason, and morality. The beast is not chaotic but slow and deliberate, suggesting that disintegration has reached a final and irreversible stage.
Bethlehem Reversed: Image of Corrupted Birth
The final image of the poem
“Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born”
completes Yeats’s vision of disintegration. Bethlehem, traditionally associated with hope and salvation, becomes the birthplace of horror. This reversal of religious imagery shows how sacred meanings have collapsed, marking the ultimate breakdown of spiritual order.
Overall Impact of Imagery:
Through these interconnected images, Yeats creates a powerful vision of a world falling apart. The imagery moves from loss of control, to violence, to spiritual emptiness, and finally to the birth of a monstrous new age. Yeats’s use of imagery does not merely describe disintegration—it makes the reader experience it emotionally and visually.
A Brief Analysis of On Being Asked for a War Poem by W. B. Yeat
On Being Asked for a War Poem is a short but powerful poem written by W. B. Yeats during the time of the First World War. Unlike many war poets who describe the horrors of the battlefield, Yeats takes a detached and reflective approach. In this poem, he explains why he refuses to write a patriotic or motivational war poem. Instead, Yeats questions the role of poetry during times of political and military conflict.
Historical and Literary Context:
The poem was written around 1915, during World War I. At this time, many poets were expected to write poems that inspired nationalism and encouraged people to support the war. Yeats, however, believed that poetry should not serve as propaganda.
Although Yeats was deeply affected by political events in Ireland and Europe, he maintained that a poet’s duty was not to influence public opinion during war, but to preserve artistic integrity.
Central Idea of the Poem:
The central idea of the poem is the limitation of poetry in political action. Yeats clearly states that poetry cannot stop violence or correct injustice during war.
He believes:
Poetry does not have the power to change political decisions.
The poet should not pretend to be a political leader or moral guide.
Art has its own space, separate from immediate political demands.
This idea is summed up in the famous line:
“A poet’s mouth be silent, for in truth
We have no gift to set a statesman right.”
Yeats’s View on the Role of the Poet
Yeats presents the poet as a private individual, not a public spokesman. He rejects the expectation that poets must comment on every political crisis.
According to Yeats:
A poet’s responsibility is personal, not political.
Poetry belongs to moments of intimacy, love, and quiet reflection, not public agitation.
The poet should not exploit tragedy for artistic fame.
This view separates Yeats from war poets like Wilfred Owen or Siegfried Sassoon, who believed poetry should expose the reality of war.
Tone and Mood:
The tone of the poem is calm, restrained, and reflective. There is no anger or emotional outburst. Instead, Yeats speaks with quiet confidence.
The mood suggests:
Emotional distance from war,Intellectual honesty,A sense of moral responsibility without activism.This controlled tone reinforces Yeats’s belief that poetry should remain thoughtful rather than reactionary.
Use of Imagery:
Yeats uses simple and domestic imagery instead of violent war images. He mentions:
- A man and a woman
- Personal moments of affection
- Everyday human experiences
- This imagery highlights the contrast between:
- Private life vs. public conflict
- Human love vs. political violence
By doing this, Yeats suggests that poetry is better suited to exploring human relationships than describing mass destruction.
Literary Devices Used:
1. Irony:
The poem is ironic because it is itself a war poem that argues against writing war poems.
2. Plain Diction:
Yeats uses clear and simple language, avoiding dramatic or emotional expressions. This strengthens the seriousness of his argument.
3. Symbolism:
The “poet’s mouth” symbolizes artistic voice, while its silence represents the poet’s refusal to misuse that voice.
Significance of the Poem;
The poem is important because it raises a timeless question: Should artists respond to political crises, or should they remain independent?
Yeats does not deny the seriousness of war, but he challenges the belief that poetry can directly influence political outcomes.
On Being Asked for a War Poem is a thoughtful and philosophical poem that presents Yeats’s firm belief in artistic independence. Rather than glorifying war or condemning it openly, Yeats explains why poetry should remain separate from political pressure. The poem reminds readers that silence, too, can be a powerful moral choice.
Major Themes in On Being Asked for a War Poem and Their Relevance Today
1. The Limits of Poetry and Art:
One of the most important themes of the poem is the limitation of poetry in changing political realities. Yeats openly admits that poets do not have the power to correct political leaders or stop wars.
“We have no gift to set a statesman right.”
Yeats suggests that expecting poetry to solve political problems places an unfair burden on art.
In the modern world, artists, writers, and influencers are often expected to comment on every political crisis, war, or social movement. Yeats’s poem reminds us that art cannot replace policy, leadership, or action, and creators should not be forced to become political spokespersons.
2. Art versus Political Propaganda:
Yeats strongly rejects the idea of using poetry as propaganda. He refuses to write a poem that would glorify war or influence public emotions for political purposes.
Today, art is frequently used in advertising, political campaigns, and social media narratives. Yeats’s stance warns against the misuse of creative expression to manipulate emotions or spread ideological agendas. His poem supports artistic freedom and integrity even in times of crisis.
3. Silence as a Moral Choice:
Another key theme is silence. Yeats believes that sometimes choosing not to speak is more honest than producing art that lacks truth or depth.
Silence in the poem does not mean indifference; it means refusal to falsify reality.
In the age of constant opinions and instant reactions on social media, silence is often seen as weakness. Yeats’s poem challenges this idea by suggesting that thoughtful restraint can be a responsible and ethical choice.
4. The Private World versus Public Conflict:
Yeats contrasts the violence of war with private, personal moments—such as love and human connection. He believes poetry belongs more naturally to these intimate experiences.
Even today, during global conflicts and political unrest, people seek comfort in personal relationships, art, and inner peace. Yeats’s poem reminds us that human connection remains meaningful even when the world is in chaos.
5. Responsibility of the Artist:
The poem raises an important question: What is the true responsibility of an artist?
Yeats argues that an artist’s duty is to remain honest to their craft rather than responding to external pressure.
Modern creators often face pressure to align with trends, ideologies, or public opinion. Yeats’s poem encourages artists to protect their creative independence and stay true to their personal vision.
Why the Poem Still Matters Today:
On Being Asked for a War Poem remains relevant because it speaks to a world where art, politics, and media constantly overlap. Yeats reminds us that not every crisis needs a poetic response and that sometimes, preserving artistic truth is itself a powerful statement.
Do I Agree with Yeats’s Assertion that Poetry Should Remain Apolitical?
I partly agree with Yeats’s assertion in On Being Asked for a War Poem that poetry should remain apolitical, but I do not accept it completely. I understand Yeats’s position and respect his honesty, yet I believe that poetry cannot always stay away from politics, especially when human suffering is involved.
Yeats argues that poetry has no power to “set a statesman right” and therefore should not be used as a political tool. I agree with him when he resists turning poetry into propaganda. Poetry written only to serve political agendas often loses its emotional depth and artistic truth. In today’s world too, many poems, slogans, and social-media verses are created to support particular ideologies rather than to express genuine human experience. In such cases, Yeats’s warning feels valid. Art should not be forced to respond to every political crisis.
However, I do not fully agree that poetry should remain completely apolitical. History shows that poetry has often given voice to pain, injustice, and resistance when politics failed to do so. War poets like Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon did not change government policies directly, but their poems changed how people felt about war. That emotional awakening itself is a form of influence. Poetry may not correct statesmen, but it can awaken conscience.
Moreover, politics deeply affects ordinary human lives. When poetry speaks about hunger, violence, displacement, or loss, it naturally enters the political space, even if it does not intend to. To expect poets to remain silent during such times may also feel like ignoring reality. Silence can be moral, as Yeats suggests, but speech can be moral too.
Therefore, my opinion is that poetry should not be obliged to be political, but it should also not be forbidden from being so. Poetry must remain free. Sometimes silence is honest; at other times, speaking out becomes necessary. The value of poetry lies not in its political position, but in its truthfulness to human experience.
The Turning Time
The world no longer moves by promises,
but by signs we barely read.
Truth does not shout
it steps back,
and waits.
The centre trembles.
Words carry weight
but cannot hold meaning anymore.
Those who once guided the way
are no longer heard.
War is not far away;
it turns with time
and reaches our doors again.
History asks the same questions
using different names.
Borders stay fixed on maps,
yet souls begin to drift.
Power moves forward,
and conscience
falls behind.
The crowd does not know
where it is going,
yet it moves
not by belief,
but by habit.
And still
within this broken order
a small flame survives.
No command,
no slogan.
Perhaps this is all that remains:
when time turns
toward the dark,
that we refuse
to let go
of the light within.
Explanation of the Poem: The Turning Time:
The Turning Time is a modernist poem inspired by W. B. Yeats’s vision of history as cyclical and unstable. The poem reflects a world facing political conflict, moral confusion, and global crisis, where traditional structures of meaning are breaking down. Like Yeats’s The Second Coming, the poem suggests that humanity is living through a moment of transition one marked by uncertainty and ethical decline, but also by quiet resistance.
The opening lines show a world that no longer trusts promises or clear truths. Instead, it moves by “signs we barely read,” suggesting misinformation, propaganda, and confusing political narratives. Truth does not disappear completely, but it retreats, indicating how honesty is pushed aside in times of crisis rather than openly destroyed.
The image of the trembling centre directly echoes Yeats’s idea that when the centre cannot hold, society begins to collapse. Words still exist, but they have lost their power to guide or unite. Leadership fails not because of silence alone, but because meaning itself has weakened. This reflects global political instability, where institutions exist but no longer inspire trust.
War in the poem is presented as cyclical rather than distant. It “turns with time” and returns repeatedly, showing how humanity fails to learn from history. Conflicts in different parts of the world repeat the same patterns of violence, only under new names and justifications. This reflects modern wars that continue despite historical knowledge of their consequences.
Borders remain fixed on maps, but “souls begin to drift,” highlighting the refugee crisis and emotional displacement caused by war and political unrest. Power advances without moral responsibility, while conscience lags behind. This imbalance reflects leadership that prioritizes control, security, and ideology over human values.
The crowd moving “by habit” rather than belief represents mass conformity and political apathy. People follow systems, narratives, and routines without questioning them. This mirrors the global crisis of civic disengagement, where individuals feel powerless or indifferent despite widespread injustice.
Yet the poem does not end in despair. The image of a small flame surviving within a broken order introduces quiet hope. Unlike loud slogans or political commands, this flame represents personal integrity, empathy, and moral resistance. It suggests that even when systems fail, individual conscience can endure.
The conclusion emphasizes inner responsibility. When time turns toward darknesswhen crises intensify the poem urges humanity not to abandon its inner light. This light symbolizes ethical awareness, compassion, and the refusal to become numb.
Major Themes in The Turning Time:
1. Disintegration of Moral and Political Order:
The trembling centre represents the breakdown of trusted institutions and shared values in a world facing political instability and conflict.
2. Cyclical Nature of War:
War returns repeatedly, showing humanity’s failure to learn from history and the ongoing nature of global conflict.
3. Loss of Meaning and Truth:
Words exist but no longer guide action, reflecting misinformation, propaganda, and moral confusion in modern society.
4. Power versus Conscience:
The poem highlights how political power advances while ethical responsibility weakens.
5. Quiet Resistance and Inner Hope;
The small flame symbolizes individual moral strength that survives even when external systems collapse.
How the Poem Reflects the Global Crisis Today:
The Turning Time mirrors today’s world, marked by wars, displaced populations, political polarization, and weakening trust in leadership. It captures the feeling of living in a moment where old certainties no longer work, yet new ones have not formed. Like Yeats, the poem suggests that while large systems may fail, human conscience remains the final source of hope.
The poem ultimately argues that in times of global crisis, salvation does not come from slogans or power, but from individuals who refuse to let go of ethical clarity. In a turning time, holding onto the inner light becomes an act of quiet resistance.
Comparison of the Treatment of War in On Being Asked for a War Poem and the War Poems of Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon:
W. B. Yeats’s On Being Asked for a War Poem treats war very differently from the poems of Wilfred Owen and Siegfried Sassoon. While Owen and Sassoon write from direct experience of the battlefield and focus on the physical and psychological horrors of war, Yeats adopts a distant, reflective, and philosophical stance. The contrast between them reveals different beliefs about the role of poetry during wartime.
Yeats: War as a Subject to Be Approached with Silence:
In On Being Asked for a War Poem, Yeats refuses to write a conventional war poem. He believes that poetry has no power to influence political leaders or stop war, and therefore should not pretend to do so. His famous assertion that a poet has “no gift to set a statesman right” shows his belief that poetry should remain independent from political propaganda.
Yeats does not describe battle scenes, soldiers, or suffering. Instead, he focuses on the limits of art and the responsibility of the poet. His tone is calm, restrained, and private. For Yeats, silence becomes a moral choice, and poetry is better suited to exploring personal human relationships than public violence.
Wilfred Owen: War as Brutal Reality and Moral Protest
Wilfred Owen’s war poetry directly contradicts Yeats’s approach. Owen writes as a soldier who experienced trench warfare firsthand. In poems like Dulce et Decorum Est and Anthem for Doomed Youth, he exposes the physical horror, suffering, and pity of war.
Owen believes poetry must tell the truth about war. His graphic imagery such as gas attacks, dying soldiers, and mental trauma forces readers to confront the reality behind patriotic slogans. Unlike Yeats, Owen clearly sees poetry as a moral weapon that can challenge false ideas of glory and heroism.
Siegfried Sassoon: War as Anger and Bitter Irony:
Siegfried Sassoon’s treatment of war is marked by anger, irony, and open protest. In poems like The Hero and Suicide in the Trenches, Sassoon attacks the hypocrisy of politicians and the romanticization of war at home.
Sassoon believes poetry should expose lies and injustice. His tone is often sharp and sarcastic, aimed directly at military leaders and civilians who support the war without understanding its cost. Unlike Yeats’s silence or Owen’s tragic pity, Sassoon’s poetry is confrontational and accusatory.
Comparison of On Being Asked for a War Poem and Dulce et Decorum Est
W. B. Yeats’s On Being Asked for a War Poem and Wilfred Owen’s Dulce et Decorum Est present two sharply contrasting responses to war. While Yeats questions whether poetry should respond to war at all, Owen believes poetry must expose the brutal truth of war. Their different treatments reflect not only different poetic styles, but also different ideas about the role of the poet.
Yeats: War and the Refusal to Speak:
In On Being Asked for a War Poem, Yeats refuses to write a traditional war poem. He claims that poetry has no power to correct political leaders:
“We have no gift to set a statesman right.”
Rather than describing war, Yeats reflects on the limits of poetry. His poem contains no images of battle, death, or soldiers. The tone is calm, controlled, and philosophical. Yeats believes that forcing poetry into political service risks turning it into propaganda. For him, silence is more honest than writing a poem that pretends to influence war or politics.
Yeats therefore treats war indirectly. It exists in the background, as a pressure placed on the poet, not as an experience to be vividly portrayed.
Owen: War as Physical Horror and Moral Truth:
In contrast, Wilfred Owen’s Dulce et Decorum Est confronts war directly and violently. Owen describes exhausted soldiers, a sudden gas attack, and the slow death of a man choking on poison gas. His imagery is graphic and disturbing:
“He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning.”
Owen’s purpose is to destroy the patriotic lie that it is sweet and honorable to die for one’s country. Unlike Yeats, Owen believes poetry must bear witness. He sees silence not as integrity, but as complicity. His poem is emotional, angry, and deeply compassionate toward the soldiers who suffer.
Key Contrast in the Treatment of War:
The most important difference lies in how each poet believes poetry should respond to war.
Yeats believes poetry should remain separate from political crisis, preserving artistic purity.
Owen believes poetry must expose reality, especially when political language lies.
Yeats writes from a position of distance and reflection, while Owen writes from lived experience. Yeats’s war is abstract and moral; Owen’s war is physical, immediate, and unbearable.
Here is a hindi podcast:
This Hindi podcast “The Pandemic Behind the Poem: W. B. Yeats’s The Second Coming” offers a thought-provoking interpretation of Yeats’s poetry by connecting it with the historical realities of war, pandemic, and political disorder. Rather than reading The Second Coming only as a symbolic or religious poem, the podcast encourages listeners to view it through the lens of the 1918 influenza pandemic. It also connects this poem with On Being Asked for a War Poem, raising important questions about the role of the poet in times of crisis.
Poetic Image and Pandemic Reality:
One of the most striking ideas discussed in the podcast is the relationship between poetic imagery and pandemic reality. Yeats’s powerful images of chaos, fear, and breakdown are not imagined in isolation; they emerge from a world experiencing mass death and uncertainty. The podcast explains that during Yeats’s time, war and the influenza pandemic together created a sense of helplessness and moral confusion. As a result, the poem reflects collective anxiety rather than individual fear.
Yeats’s Apocalypse: Two Ways of Reading The Second Coming:
1. The Traditional Vision: War and Anarchy:
Traditionally, The Second Coming has been read as a poem about war, political collapse, and social anarchy. Lines such as “Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold” and “Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world” are often interpreted as responses to World War I and revolutionary violence. The podcast acknowledges this interpretation but suggests that it does not fully explain the poem’s intensity.
2. The Pandemic Lens: The 1918 Influenza:
The podcast introduces an alternative and compelling interpretation by linking the poem to the 1918 flu pandemic. Through this lens, the breakdown described in the poem reflects failing medical systems, fear of invisible death, and the collapse of everyday life. The “centre” that cannot hold represents not just political authority, but also social and scientific systems overwhelmed by disease. This reading makes the poem especially meaningful in the context of modern pandemics.
The Significance of the Opening Line;
The opening line, “Turning and turning in the widening gyre,” receives special attention in the podcast. It reflects Yeats’s belief that history moves in cycles. During periods of extreme crisis such as war or pandemic these cycles widen, and control is lost. The falcon’s inability to hear the falconer symbolizes humanity’s loss of guidance, stability, and moral direction.
On Being Asked for a War Poem: The Poet’s Silence:
The podcast also discusses Yeats’s poem On Being Asked for a War Poem (1915) to explain Yeats’s attitude toward political writing. In this poem, Yeats refuses to write a patriotic war poem, claiming that poets have no power to correct political leaders. The podcast interprets this refusal as a deliberate and ethical choice a poet’s silence in the face of political pressure.
The Central Irony: A Poem of Refusal:
An important point raised in the podcast is the central irony of On Being Asked for a War Poem. Although Yeats claims he will not write a war poem, he does so in the form of a poem. This creates a tension between the private role of the poet and the public demand for political commentary. The poem itself becomes a statement about the limits of poetry.
Should Writers Write About Politics?:
The podcast finally raises a crucial question: Should writers respond directly to politics during times of crisis? Yeats’s position, as explained in the podcast, is not a rejection of responsibility but a rejection of propaganda. He believes poetry should remain truthful to human experience rather than serve political agendas. This question remains relevant today, when writers and artists are often expected to take clear political positions.
Contemporary Relevance:
Through the pandemic lens, the podcast shows how Yeats’s poetry continues to speak to the modern world. Our experiences of global pandemics, wars, and political instability echo the uncertainty of Yeats’s time. The poems help us understand not just events, but the emotional and moral disorientation that accompanies crisis.
This Hindi podcast deepens the understanding of Yeats’s poetry by revealing the historical realities behind its apocalyptic imagery. By linking The Second Coming to the 1918 flu and On Being Asked for a War Poem to the question of poetic responsibility, the podcast highlights Yeats’s lasting relevance. It reminds us that poetry may not offer solutions, but it helps us reflect, question, and endure during times when the world feels as though it is falling apart.
References:
.png)
.jpeg)
